As the lenses of ether near space bodies (by the Fresnel and Stokes)
exist, in them there is a gradient of pressure (by Miller). According to
experiments of Fiseau and Foucault, velocity of light should be greater in
space, than at a surface of the Earth, as indicate modern calculations by
results of observations of Remer for satellites of Jupiter, (c =
3,05·108 m/s). At approach to the Earth and to the Sun it
should decrease, and at removal – to be increase, as precise measuring
have shown. Last fact contradicts relativistic views and calculations on
deviation of light near massive bodies and simultaneously displays that
density of ether at approach to them grows. All these and other scientific
facts testify that the waiving of ether and classic invariant of space,
time and mass was a tragically error. The hypothesis of the Fresnel about
a partial dragging of ether by bodies should appear again in a center of
attention.
However, returning to an old kind classic mechanics of the Galilei –
Newton – Euler – Laplace – Lagrange, it is necessary to stare at it:
whether is all harmonic and correct in it? Respect and delight by it
should not substitute of the critical analysis.
And now, more then 300 years later we discover that the classic
mechanics consists from separate, incoherent among themselves parts. So,
the law of universal gravitation is disconnected with dynamics. Dynamics
actually is dynamics of inertia, and law of inertia is not selected as
separate interaction. After all new formalisms of dynamics created on the
basis of a principle of the least action (Mopertjui, Euler, and Lagrange)
energy conservation law (Lagrange, Hamilton, Jacobi, Ostrogradskii), as
well as a non-strength mechanics of a Hertz appear by versions of dynamics
of inertia. The gravitation has remained virginally primitive till
appearance of Gerber's works. In this works the gravitation was
generalized on speed of interaction, i.e. graviodynamics was created. The
researchers did not realize the fact of its occurrence. That has led
physics in crisis at the end of XIX century and to appearance of theories
– fallacies: STR and GTR.
By analogy with a Coulomb's law, which one is an electrostatics, the
law of universal gravitation is graviostatics, though it is deduced for
interaction of planets moving around of central bodies (Sun – planet,
Earth – moon). However value of distance which is included in it,
practically is constant, that means, that the relative velocity of
interacting bodies (first derivative from distance on time) on a line
connecting them practically is equal to zero.
Electrostatics of the Coulomb was lucky little bit more, than
graviostatics of a Newton, as the electrodynamics laws were detected
experimentally by Oersted, Arago, Ampere and Faraday. But... It was
necessary to appear the theories of an electrodynamics in transactions of
the Gauss, Weber, and Clausius... Lorentz, as the scientific world, not
having understood, that the electrostatics has received generalization on
speed of interaction, which they have accepted for velocity of light, has
turned away from it. And first of them Lorentz has made it, strangely
enough. The Lorentz has refused an electrodynamics for the reason that its
laws (except for Maxwell equations, which one are dynamics of fields, not
bodies) were not subjected to a general relativity, but which one Lorentz
very wish to enter. Lorentz, and behind him Poincare, Einstein and behind
them all relativists negligently stepped over the child, which one they
throw out...
The dynamics of an electromagnetic interaction was disclaimed. The
destiny of Gerber's graviodynamics completely depended on the unique fact:
abnormal displacement of perihelions of planets. Moreover, Gerber's law of
graviodynamics the law delayed potential) is not subjected general
relativity not only, but also the relativity of the Galilei (and,
therefore, does not have notorious equality of heavy and inert mass).
What was a sense of introduction of a general relativity? Understanding
now, that dynamics of a classic mechanics is dynamics of inertia, and the
inertia is the special kind of interaction, which one does not depend from
gravitational, electromagnetic or nuclear interactions, we see, what
exactly the inertia expresses a relativity of the Galilei and is its
essence. Propagation and generalization of Galilean principle (laws of
inertia) on other interactions, especially, not knowing, as the laws of
inertia are deformed at high velocities is something in themselves, that
there are no basis.
At rise of a general principle and also special and general relativity
theories the set of logic errors is committed which one separately and
together have resulted in incorrect conclusions and generalizations. By
consideration, for example, of the gravitation we cannot tear off
interacting bodies from each other, placing one of them in the invented
reference system, to which one we can give arbitrary (theoretical) motion.
And placing in this system even both gravitating bodies, how is it
possible to tear off them from environment, with the help by which one
they interact?! Considering motion of the freely dropping elevator
Einstein has committed these roughest logic errors, not suspecting, that
he does not know graviodynamics, that is properties and laws of forces of
interaction at relative movement of interacting bodies. In outcome GTR is
absurd mixture of inertia and gravitation.
Thus relativists peculiarly "have refuted" Gerber's graviodynamics. So,
N.T. Roseveare in the book "Mercury's perihelion from Le Verrier to
Einstein" (World, M., 1985) has written: "the Second reason, on which one
the law of Gerber should be rejected (first reason he has called correct
Gerber's forecast of displacement of perihelions of planets, but to which
one, on a view of Roseveare, it is to add a relativistic effect (?! –
N.N.)), is a deflection of light in gravitational field of the Sun. The
calculations of these deviations make 2,62" – under the theory of Gerber
and 1,75" – on a relativity theory. The expedition in Sobral (1919) has
obtained value 1,98"±0,16"; the results of measuring of Freindlich (1929)
was equal to 2,24"±0,16"; the results obtained in USSR (1949) has appeared
2,73"±0,31". More late measurements have not confirmed so considerable
deviation, and the disproof of a relativity theory did not take
place. But the mentioned experiments on deviation of light near the
Sun were done by adherents of the relativity theory not by the opponents,
therefore rhetorical conclusion of Roseveare about the disproof looks very
strange.
But now it is necessary in general to subject to doubt idea of
deviation of light near to massive bodies from positions of relativists.
The point is that for a calculation of deviation they profit by
relativistic mass of photons (it is considered, that photons are particles
with a zero rest mass). And then their attraction is calculated under the
laws of Gerber or theory of relativity as if this interaction happens with
indefinitely high velocity of interaction. But if to consider, that the
velocity of interaction is equal to velocity of light, deviation of light
as a result of attraction should not be, as the interaction potential will
delay completely. But except of this sensible reasoning the experimental
fact of slowing-down of photons has appeared at approximation to the Earth
and Sun and acceleration of them at removal, about which one is written
above, and which one displays absurdity of the statement of
relativists.
The properties and laws of graviodynamics are connected to the
mechanism of interaction at relative movement of interacting bodies. The
research of a phenomenon of delay of a potential on a moving body has
result me in a conclusion that the delay of a potential happens
non-uniformly. It results in longitudinal vibrations of a moving body.
Energy of such motion of bodies has the law distinguished from smooth
motion in a mechanics of a Newton. It has served as the basis for
appearance so-called "of a defect of mass" and "of an equivalent of mass
and energy".
Based on profound fallacies and logic errors, the general relativity
has generated illusion of the modern researchers that it is possible and
even as if necessary to make "great" and "super-great" amalgamation of
interactions. The purpose and main point of it naturally has not common
sense. But poet, the logic which one is faultless, prevented "In the same
team it is not possible to harness both the horse and the quivering
doe".
It is necessary to tell some words about the logic, so far as the
researchers made the logic errors earlier and go on to make them now.
On an example of activity of a brain of the person the nature has
shown, that logic is top of intellect. Logic is top of development of the
nature having integrated in itself all kinds of mathematics and experience
accumulated by mankind. Above logic anything is not present.
Why do we so appreciate transactions of the philosophers, writers, and
poets? Everyone, who read "Memoirs about Sherlock Holmes" of Conan Doyle,
was striked by force of logical thinking of Holmes. The activity of the
researcher in science is similar to activity of a detective. But look
round, and you will find out, that logic is unloved stepdaughter of
science. It is not studied at schools and institutes. Logic frequently
fined itself by subject of speculation in science not only, but also in
policy, as well as in journalism and in religion.
At scientists, educated on relativistic positions, a substitution of
logic by the expressions of authorities, cliches and false conclusions
occurred. Especially a lot of such conclusions were made concerning
classic invariant and ether. Founders of a relativism and leaders of
scrambling against the logically faultless theory of a Newton were Berkly
(1685...1753), Toland (1838...1916), and then During, Mach, Gartman and
Avenarius. They were zealously supported by relativists. Minkowski and
Einstein were at the head of them. Logic errors, inexactitude of logical
thinking, violation of the laws of scientific logic, substitution of
notions, fiction and ungrounded suppositions are their tools of scrambling
against the theory of a Newton.
From the moment of occurrence STR and GTR (1905...1915) besides "the
bending of a space-time" relativists were in time to do so much logic
errors, that only their list would take more places than this entire
article.
So, for example, for explanation of a nuclear interaction the
hypothetical exchanged particles (Yukava), {as if well describing (but not
explaining) interaction} were entered. Further (oh, my God!) these
particles have appeared real-life, and now their existence is not called
in question at all.
But... What the logic speaks in this occasion? And it speaks that such
particles should, at first, have reason and, secondly, energy conservation
laws are not kept.
Finally, researchers of the delayed potential having a such mechanism
of interaction (made by Porkhovnik and Surdin (1956) result in law, which
one does not correlate with observed and experimental data. Besides,
above-mentioned law does not submit to general principle of relativity.
The last fact shows that the relativistic theory has not consent inside
itself.
In the same manner it is possible to speak about "an equivalent of mass
and energy", "wave – particle", "a defect of mass" etc. etc.. It led to
conclusion that the logic is not in honour at physicists. Common sense,
against which relativists have declared war, is result of the logical
laws.
Знаете ли Вы, что релятивистское объяснение феномену CMB (космическому микроволновому излучению) придумал человек выдающейся фантазии Иосиф Шкловский (помните книжку миллионного тиража "Вселенная, жизнь, разум"?). Он выдвинул совершенно абсурдную идею, заключавшуюся в том, что это есть "реликтовое" излучение, оставшееся после "Большого Взрыва", то есть от момента "рождения" Вселенной. Хотя из простой логики следует, что Вселенная есть всё, а значит, у нее нет ни начала, ни конца... Подробнее читайте в FAQ по эфирной физике.
